3.6L interference engine or not? - Page 2 - Chevy Malibu Forum: Chevrolet Malibu Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #11 of 15 (permalink) Old 04-10-2009, 10:55 AM Thread Starter
CMF Senior Member
 
slhaas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 439
Re: 3.6L interference engine or not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by edmalibu83 View Post
I dont believe so. The only engine GM ever made that was like that was in the old Saturn L300s with the 3.0L and if I remember right it was a DOHC engine. I think those are the only ones that are possible to be interference engines.


Quote:
Originally Posted by beach View Post
They were GM, and the 3.0L with a timing belt was used in more than just that car, but also the Saturn Vue, Cadillac Catera/Opel Omega (and a lot of other Euro-market GM vehicles), Cadillac CTS as a bored 3.2L variety for the first model year, etc.

Otherwise, all North American GM engines use a lifetime (essentially...I've known people to go hundreds of thousands of miles and never touch it) timing chain except for the--again, Euro sourced and unique--Saturn/Opel Astra with a timing belt 1.8L 4-cyl.

The timing chain is always something that often mystifies Honda, Toyota, Nissan, etc., etc. past owners who are used to their timing belt/water pump change at a certain mileage interval. A timing chain breaking, especially on a GM vehicle engine, is so far out of the ordinary, that it's rarely even thought of. It can happen, yes, but if anything and only after many, many, many miles would the chain even start to wear at all.
That's not entirely true. I don't know about other brands, but I'm 99% sure my Nissan Sentra had a timing chain, not a belt.

I don't think that an engine had to be DOHC to be an interference motor either, but I guess I don't know that for sure. I know a lot of older engines were non-interference and I believe more & more newer engines are interference type engines.

What happens is if the timing chain/belt breaks or malfunctions, your valves either do or don't have enough room, when not timed properly, to clear the valves. If there isn't enough room then serious damage can occur when the parts knock into each other. Newer engines often have less clearance because space is reduced for increased power & efficiency, though not all newer engines are interference type motors. This really is more of an issue with timing belt applications as they're more likely to fail, but it's something I always like to know anyway. With a non-interference timing chain motor I'll let it go until there is a problem with the chain as there isn't a worry for damage. If it is an interference engine with a timing chain, I will be much more diligent in checking the chain at certain service intervals to be sure there isn't a problem.


edit: Isn't this a DOHC VVT engine anyway? Further review shows Nissan has indeed switched back to timing chains. Toyota is a mix, and I didn't see anything about Honda.

Last edited by slhaas; 04-10-2009 at 11:12 AM.
slhaas is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 15 (permalink) Old 04-10-2009, 04:11 PM
CMF Veteran Member
 
beach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Southern Delaware
Posts: 915
Re: 3.6L interference engine or not?

I never meant to imply Honda, Toyota, Nissan, etc. never use timing chains--they absolutely do, in some designs--but it's not overly common, or their norm. For instance, the Toyota 3.0L & 3.3L version V6 always used a belt, then in the last couple of years when they came out with the eventual replacement for both with a new 3.5L it now also used a chain. But that's not overly widespread, by any means, and certainly nothing like the GM "norm" of timing chains.

So it's still a very common question from anyone coming from years of Accords, etc. that have never used anything but the mainstay timing belts, when coming to a GM or any other vehicle that doesn't.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Momma wanted some power...


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Dark Gray Metallic, Titanium UltraLux
___________________________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

The new ride...


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
beach is offline  
post #13 of 15 (permalink) Old 04-10-2009, 04:44 PM Thread Starter
CMF Senior Member
 
slhaas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 439
Re: 3.6L interference engine or not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by beach View Post
I never meant to imply Honda, Toyota, Nissan, etc. never use timing chains--they absolutely do, in some designs--but it's not overly common, or their norm. For instance, the Toyota 3.0L & 3.3L version V6 always used a belt, then in the last couple of years when they came out with the eventual replacement for both with a new 3.5L it now also used a chain. But that's not overly widespread, by any means, and certainly nothing like the GM "norm" of timing chains.

So it's still a very common question from anyone coming from years of Accords, etc. that have never used anything but the mainstay timing belts, when coming to a GM or any other vehicle that doesn't.
That may be true. I don't know much about Honda or Toyota's use of chains vs. belts. It still isn't true for Nissan. My understanding is that chains are the default with Nissan, and have been for a while now. It didn't used to be that way, but they changed because of issues with belts breaking and their interference engines.
slhaas is offline  
 
post #14 of 15 (permalink) Old 12-28-2018, 01:22 PM
CMF Rookie Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1
Re: 3.6L interference engine or not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by beach View Post
They were GM, and the 3.0L with a timing belt was used in more than just that car, but also the Saturn Vue, Cadillac Catera/Opel Omega (and a lot of other Euro-market GM vehicles), Cadillac CTS as a bored 3.2L variety for the first model year, etc.

Otherwise, all North American GM engines use a lifetime (essentially...I've known people to go hundreds of thousands of miles and never touch it) timing chain except for the--again, Euro sourced and unique--Saturn/Opel Astra with a timing belt 1.8L 4-cyl.

The timing chain is always something that often mystifies Honda, Toyota, Nissan, etc., etc. past owners who are used to their timing belt/water pump change at a certain mileage interval. A timing chain breaking, especially on a GM vehicle engine, is so far out of the ordinary, that it's rarely even thought of. It can happen, yes, but if anything and only after many, many, many miles would the chain even start to wear at all.
mY SON HAD A 1995 HODA WITH A 160,000 ON IT. TIMING CHAIN REPLACED AT 100,000. ENGINE DESTROY DUE TPO ZERO CLEARANCE DESIGN. CARR GET JUNKS AFTER THAT. nEVR DROVE A gm TO THE JUNK YET.
rANDYETANS is offline  
post #15 of 15 (permalink) Old 03-25-2019, 07:50 PM
CMF Rookie Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1
Currently working on a 12 camaro that snapped a tensioner guide and bent valves, it's interference
Chrischris70 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Chevy Malibu Forum: Chevrolet Malibu Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MPG on new engine DDMay87 General Discussion (Generation 7) 8 02-27-2009 05:57 PM
engine ? stikboy General Discussion (Generation 7) 1 01-25-2009 08:29 AM
New engine option beach General Discussion (Generation 7) 12 12-06-2008 05:45 AM
2.4 Engine vs. V6 jaymista General Discussion (Generation 7) 20 05-16-2008 07:27 PM
New Engine? djpabmusic Modifications (Generation 7) 6 03-08-2008 03:21 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome