Non-turbo engines are flawless, not one has ever failed.
I never said that they didn't fail, only that I have less plumbing and less heat under the hood.
For those not aware of the inference posted by
@campb292, my 2011 3.6L V6 exploded on me one morning on the way to work. I was only a mile or two from home. One of the con rods poked a hole in the side of the block as well as another hole in the oil pan. At the time, the car had been in service for 4 years, 9 months, and it had 94,xxx miles on it. The Power Train warranty was 5 years/100,xxx miles. And yes, the engine was completely replaced at zero cost to me.
So, I now have a car with 157,xxx and an engine with 63,xxx miles on it. I expect the engine to go way past 94,xxx and the car to exceed 200,xxx or even 300,xxx without any further major issues.
Before that event, I had been pushing my car to the limits quite often, such as shifting at high RPMs and "straightening out" the curves, mostly on highway off-ramps and on-ramps. I tend to think that those curves led to windage and oil starvation, and that the straight-line launches with the engine sometimes reaching 7200 RPMs, to be major contributors to the engine dying prematurely. In essence, it was my fault but I still got treated well. The only positive thing that could be said is that I was using full-synthetic oil at the time, which I believe delayed it.
I still use full-synthetic oil, and I drive a lot differently. I don't think the engine has exceeded 7ooo RPM, and I'm more restrained when going around corners, especially the long, sweeping kind.
So, yes, I still love my non-turbo engine, and I always will. That statement was not made as a hater. If it was taken as such, my apologies. But I still appreciate my current ride. You're allowed to love yours, hate yours, or be ambivalent, and it won't change how I feel about mine.